Thomas K. Boardman


  • Member, Hastings Science and Technology Law Journal
  • Research Assistant to Professors Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr. and Rory K. Little
  • Judicial Law Clerk to the Hon. Christina Reiss in the United States District Court,
    District of Vermont
  • Finalist for Consumer Attorney of the Year (2013)
  • Super Lawyers Rising Stars: Antitrust (2015 – 2020)


Mr. Boardman is a Partner in the Firm’s New York office where he focuses on antitrust litigation and leads the firm’s commodity manipulation litigation practice.

While attending law school, he was a member of the Hastings Science and Technology Law Journal and worked as a research assistant to Professors Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr. and Rory K. Little.

Prior to joining Scott+Scott, Mr. Boardman worked at Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP in San Francisco.

Mr. Boardman co-authored the following articles: Reverse Engineering Your Antitrust Case: Plan for Trial Even Before You File Your Case, Antitrust Magazine, Spring 2014, Vol. 28, No. 2, with Bruce L. Simon; and Class Action for Health Professionals, chapter from Advocacy Strategies for Health and Mental Health Professionals, Springer Publishing Co., 2011, with Bruce L. Simon, Stuart L. Lustig, Editor.

Mr. Boardman is an avid runner and can regularly be found doing laps of Prospect Park.


  • In re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litig., No. 13-cv-7789 (S.D.N.Y.)
    ($2.3 billion settlement)
  • In re GSE Bonds Antitrust Litig., No. 19-cv-1704 (S.D.N.Y.) ($386.5 million settlement)
  • In re Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litig., No 3:15-md-2626 (M.D. Fla.) ($43.2 million)
  • In re Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litig., No. 1:18-cv-2830 (S.D.N.Y.)
  • Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Bank of America Corp., No. 14-cv-7126 (S.D.N.Y)
    ($504.5 million settlement)
  • In re Bank of Nova Scotia Spoofing Litig., No. 20-cv-11059 (D. N.J.)

Representative Cases – prior to Scott+Scott:

  • In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litig. (nominated by Consumer Attorneys of California as a finalist for Consumer Attorney of the Year)
  • In re Potash Antitrust Litig. (II), (unanimous victory before an en banc panel of the Seventh Circuit, resulting in one of the most influential antitrust appellate opinions in recent memory)
  • In re NCAA Athletic Grant-In-Aid Cap Antitrust Litig. and In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Litig. (landmark antitrust litigation against the NCAA)