A securities class action has been filed against AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired AST securities between March 4, 2025 through July 15, 2026. This case has been filed in the USDC – WDTX.
On January 7, 2026, Scotiabank downgraded AST to sell, citing, among other things, significant competition from SpaceX’s Starlink, slow customer adoption, and delays in launching AST’s satellites. Then, on July 15, 2026, AST issued a press release “announc[ing] the pricing of $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 1.625% convertible senior notes due 2034”.
Following the downgrade, AST’s stock price fell $11.76 per share, or 12.06%, to close at $85.73 per share on January 7, 2026.
Then, on July 15, 2026, AST issued a press release “announc[ing] the pricing of $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 1.625% convertible senior notes due 2034”.
On this news, AST’s stock price fell $11.30 per share, or 17.04%, to close at $55.01 per share on July 16, 2026.
The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, AST made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, AST made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) AST’s increasing capital requirements were likely to increase the Company’s debt load and share dilution with greater frequency and at greater scale than Defendants had signaled to investors; (ii) accordingly, AST had overstated the sufficiency of AST’s capital and liquidity position to achieve its strategic and business goals; (iii) Defendants likewise overstated the durability of AST’s competitive position in the satellite D2C market; (iv) even following the EchoStar Transaction, AST continued overstating AST’s competitive position in the satellite D2C market; (v) AST was experiencing slow user adoption in the U.S. and Japan; (vi) the foregoing was likely to have a significant negative impact on the Company’s business and financial prospects; and (vii) as a result, AST’’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.