Representative cases

In re LendingClub Corp.S’holder Litig.,
No. CIV 537300 (Cal. Super. Ct, San Mateo Cnty.)
A securities litigation resulting in one of the top ten securities recoveries ever in the Northern District of California ($125 global settlement).

In re Micro Focus Int’l plc Sec. Litig.,
No. 18CIV01549 (CA Super. Ct. San Mateo Cnty.)
A case on behalf of a union pension fund centering on misleading statements made by the defendant relating to a software business merger ($107.5 million settlement).

Okla. Firefighters Pens. vs. Newell Brands Inc.,
No. L-003492-18 (N.J. Sup. Ct. Hudson Cnty.)
A securities fraud case based on Newell Brands making misleading statements concerning its sales growth and revenue  ($102.5 million settlement).

In re Greensky Sec. Litig.,
No. 1:18 Civ. 11071 (S.D.N.Y.)
A case alleging that the fintech company failed to disclose information about its business model resulting in substantial financial losses for investors ($27.5M settlement).

In re Wash. Mut. Mortg.-Backed Sec. Lit.,
No. 2:09-cv-00037 (W.D. Wash.)
A securities fraud case alleging that the defendant misrepresented underwriting procedures used to originate mortgage loan collateral ($26 million recovery).

ATRS v Insulet Corp.,
No. 15-12345 (D. Mass.)
A case centering on the insulin management providers misleading statements about the company’s profitability ($19.5 million settlement).

In re King Digit. Ent. PLC S’holder Litig.,
No. CGC-15-544770  (Cal. Sup. Ct. San Francisco Cnty.)
A securities fraud case alleging that the defendant – the inventor of the hit game “Candy Crush” – made false statements in its Initial Public Offering prospectus in relation to its long-term profitability ($18.5 million settlement).

In re Evoqua Water Corp. Sec. Litig.,
No. 1:18-cv-10320 (S.D.N.Y)
A litigation centering on the water treatment services provider made false and misleading statements in its IPO prospectus, subsequently leading to a significant drop in revenue ($16.65 million settlement).

In re Priceline.com, Inc. Sec. Litig.,
No. 3:00-cv-01884 (D. Conn.)
Securities fraud action on behalf of priceline.com investors alleging misrepresentation of the Company’s business model ($80 million settlement).

Irvine v. ImClone Sys., Inc.,
No. 1:02-cv-00109 (S.D.N.Y.)
Securities fraud case arising out of the drug manufacturer’s concealment of adverse information relating to the Company’s flagship new drug candidate ($75 million settlement).

Cornwell v. Credit Suisse Grp.,
No. 08-cv-03758 (S.D.N.Y.)
Securities fraud class action alleging false and misleading statements by the investment bank regarding its profitability, loan debt and risk management policies ($70 million settlement).

Policemen’s Annuity & Benefit Fund of Chi. v. Bank of Am., N.A.,
No. 12-cv-02865 (S.D.N.Y.)
Class action alleging failure to repurchase defective mortgages against Bank of America and U.S. Bank, as Trustees for Washington Mutual-sponsored mortgage-backed securities ($69 million settlement).

In re SanDisk LLC Sec. Litig.,
No. 15-cv-01455 (N.D. Cal.)
Securities fraud class action against data storage company SanDisk Corporation and certain of its officers and directors alleging false and misleading statements regarding sales and production delays ($50 million settlement).

Weston v. RCS Capital Corp.,
No. 1:14-cv-10136 (S.D.N.Y.)
Securities fraud class action alleging false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s core wholesale distribution, investment banking businesses, and its prospects for success ($31 million settlement).