Antitrust + Competition

Scott+Scott represents investors, businesses, and consumers in price-fixing, bid-rigging, monopolization, and other restraints-of-trade cases on both a class-wide and individual basis. The Firm’s work for our clients helps ensure that markets remain free, open, and competitive.

Attorneys View Cases

Landmark Cases


Antitrust + Competition

$2.3 Billion in US settlements for market manipulation


Securities Litigation

Novel investment recovery under The Trust Indenture Act


Consumer Litigation

Data Breach case with $50 Million settlement


Corporate Governance

Record-setting sexual harassment settlement of $310 Million in corporate reforms

The American Antitrust Institute has recognized Scott+Scott for our innovative enforcement of antitrust laws on behalf of private plaintiffs in 2014, 2018 and 2020, making us the most decorated firm during that time period. In addition, the 2018 Antitrust Annual Report found that in 2018 the Firm had the highest antitrust settlement in the country, as well as ranking first nationally in aggregate settlement amount from 2013 to 2018, recovering over $3.4 billion.

Scott+Scott has pioneered the use of antitrust laws in the financial sector, including credit default swaps, private equity, bonds, interest rate derivatives and foreign exchange, to recover for investors. Unlike other firms that predominantly file “follow on” cases after government enforcement actions, Scott+Scott invests “upfront” in economists, investigators and attorney analysis to bring novel cases before the rest of the antitrust bar and regulators.

Scott+Scott’s passion for litigating competition matters in the financial sector extends to its commodity manipulation litigation practice. Using the Commodity Exchange Act, Scott+Scott’s lawyers regularly bring claims on behalf of municipal and pension funds, retail investors, and others harmed by major financial institutions’ manipulation of commodity markets. Attorneys in Scott+Scott’s commodity manipulation group have decades of experience litigating these matters and have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars on behalf of their clients.

Our dedicated team of antitrust partners have built one of the nation’s top plaintiffs’ firms for antitrust actions. Furthermore, our European expansion reflects a commitment and ability to pursue claims on a global basis.


In re: Foreign Exch. Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litig.
No. 13-cv-07789 (S.D.N.Y.)
Challenging price-fixing of foreign exchange rates. (over $2.3 billion in final-approved settlements). The largest antitrust settlement of 2018 according to the American Antitrust Institute;

Dahl v. Bain Capital Partners, LLC,
No. 07-cv-12388 (D. Mass.)
Challenging bid rigging and market allocation of leveraged buyouts by private equity firms. ($590.5 million in settlements);

Alaska Elec. Pension Fund v. Bank of Am. Corp.
No. 14-cv-07126 (S.D.N.Y.)
Challenging price-fixing of the ISDAfix benchmark interest rate. ($504.5 million in settlements). The 3rd largest antitrust settlement of 2018 according to the American Antitrust Institute;

In re GSE Bonds Antitrust Litig.
No. 19-cv-01704 (S.D.N.Y.)
Challenging manipulation in the market( for bonds issued by Government-Sponsored Entities, e.g., Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. ($386 million settlement).

“Opt-out” Litigation

In addition to its class action work, Scott+Scott also represents clients in opt-out antitrust litigation. The Firm’s success in class actions allows us to provide our opt-out clients unique and valuable insights. Representative clients include Parker Hannifin Corporation, PolyOne Corporation, Eastman Kodak Company, and Fujifilm Manufacturing U.S.A., Inc., in the following matters:

In re: Aluminum Warehousing Antitrust Litig., MDL
No. 2481 (S.D.N.Y.)
A case challenging collusion regarding the spot metal price of physically delivered aluminum

The following cases all involved price-fixing by horizontal competitors in the synthetic rubber industry:

In re Rubber Chemicals Antitrust Litig., MDL
No. 1648 (N.D. Cal.)

In re Polychloroprene Rubber (CR) Antitrust Litig., MDL
No. 1642 (D. Conn.)

In re Plastic Additives Antitrust Litig. (No. II), MDL
No. 1684 (E.D. Pa.).

Follow us on Social media or sign up for email alerts

Sign up for alerts

News + Press

Antitrust Markus-Hutschneider Scott+Scott hires Deutsche Bahn counsel to lead new office

Scott+Scott hires Deutsche Bahn counsel to lead new office

Markus Hutschneider, former head of case management competition litigation for Deutsche Bahn, has joined Scott+Scott to head its new competition litigation-focused Berlin office.

Read More
Antitrust The Firm
Antitrust berlin Scott+Scott Launches Berlin Office With Antitrust Pro

Scott+Scott Launches Berlin Office With Antitrust Pro

US plaintiffs firm Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP announced Thursday it is launching a Berlin office led by an antitrust expert from Deutsche Bahn in an effort to cater to large multinationals seeking damages for breaches of competition law.

Read More
Antitrust The Firm
Antitrust shipping containers being loaded and unloaded at the dock Car Shipping Cartel Faces £150M Class Action

Car Shipping Cartel Faces £150M Class Action

Five shipping companies fined for running a cartel for transporting cars to the UK have become the target of a £150 million ($189 million) US-style class action in London led by law firm Scott+Scott UK LLP.

Read More
Antitrust The Firm
Antitrust close up of luxury car Class action could mean refund of £60 per new car

Class action could mean refund of £60 per new car

Dealerships could be in line for a refund of up to £60 per new car that they bought, thanks to a class action against five major shipping companies.

Read More
Antitrust The Firm