Scott+Scott’s Consumer Practice Group consists of some of the premier advocates in the area of consumer protection and has been at the forefront in litigating and securing some of the most significant consumer protection settlements on behalf of our clients, resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars to class members. The Firm’s Consumer Practice Group has attorneys dedicated to three primary areas: Data Breach/Data Privacy Litigation, Healthcare and Pharmaceutical Litigation, and Consumer Protection Litigation.
Antitrust + Competition
$2.3 Billion in US settlements for market manipulation
Securities Litigation
Novel investment recovery under The Trust Indenture Act
Consumer Litigation
Data Breach case with $50 Million settlement
Corporate Governance
Record-setting sexual harassment settlement of $310 Million in corporate reforms
The Firm has extensive experience litigating data privacy and data breach class actions advancing cutting-edge legal theories. We have achieved some of the largest recoveries in this area.
First Choice Fed. Credit Union v. Wendy’s Co.,
No. 16-cv-16506 (W.D. Pa.)
Class action on behalf credit card issuers for Wendy’s Data Breach which exposed 18 million consumer payment cards. ($50 million settlement to compensate financial institutions for reimbursements they made to customers).
In re Equifax, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litig.,
No. 1:17-md-02800 (N.D. Ga.)
Co-lead counsel on behalf of financial institutions injured as a result of the 2017 Equifax data breach that exposed the personal and financial information of approximately 150 million U.S. consumers. (Settlement valued in excess of $32.5 million).
The Home Depot, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litig, MDL
No. 2583 (N.D. Ga.)
Co-lead counsel on behalf of financial institutions involving data breach and theft of the personal and financial information of over 40 million credit and debit card holders. ($27.25 million settlement).
In re Target Corporation Customer Data Security Breach Litig, MDL
No. 2522 (D. Minn.)
Complaint on behalf of financial institutions injured by the theft of sensitive payment card information. ($59 million settlement).
Greater Chautauqua Federal Credit Union v. Kmart Corporation,
No. 1:15-cv-02228 (N.D. Ill.)
Complaint on behalf of financial institutions injured by the theft of sensitive payment card information.
(Settlement valued at $13.4 million).
WinSouth Credit Union v. Mapco Express, Inc.,
No. 3:14-cv-01573 (M.D. Tenn.)
Largest per dollar per card recovery involving payment card data breach brought on behalf of a class of financial institutions.
In re Vizio Inc., Consumer Privacy Litig.,
MDL No. 8:16-ml-02693 (N.D. Cal.)
Complaint regarding collection and sale of personal information obtained through consumers’ televisions. ($17 million settlement).
Scott+Scott represents consumers and health and welfare funds throughout the United States who have been overcharged in connection with their insurance and pharmaceutical transactions.
Scott+Scott has significant experience litigating against insurance companies and pharmaceutical manufacturers. Our lawyers have obtained some of the largest settlements in consumer healthcare litigation, including:
In re Managed Care Litig., MDL
No. 1334 (S.D. Fla.)
(Settlements with Aetna, CIGNA, Prudential, Health Net, Humana, and WellPoint providing monetary and injunctive benefits exceeding $1 billion).
In re Prudential Ins. Co. SGLI/VGLI Contract Litig.,
No. 2208 (D. Mass.)
Complaint on behalf of a class of military service members and their families who had purchased insurance contracts. ($40 million settlement).
Scott+Scott has been at the forefront in prosecuting consumer protection actions against organizations engaging in unfair practices. Over the past decade, we have litigated a number of diverse cases, fought for rights of consumers to be treated fairly and equitably and have achieved significant settlements that have protected consumers’ rights and recovered substantial monetary benefits.
The Vulcan Society, Inc. v. The City of New York,
No. 1:07-cv-02067 (E.D.N.Y.)
Complaint on behalf of a class of black applicants who sought to be New York City firefighters, but were denied or delayed employment due to racial discrimination. ($100 million settlement and significant injunctive relief).
In re Providian Financial Corp. Credit Card Terms Litig., MDL
No. 1301 (E.D. Pa.)
Complaint on behalf of a class of credit card holders who were charged excessive interest and late charges on their credit cards. ($105 million settlement).
In re Pre-Filled Propane Tank Marketing & Sales Practices Litig.,
MDL No. 2086 (W.D. Mo.)
Complaint on behalf of class of propane purchasers who alleged defendants overcharged the class for under-filled propane tanks. ($37 million settlement).
Murr v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.,
No. 1:13-cv-01091 (E.D. Va.)
Complaint on behalf of class of consumers who were misled into accepting purportedly 0% interest credit card offers. ($7.3 million settlement pending).
Gunther v. Capital One, N.A.,
No. 2:09-cv-02966 (E.D.N.Y.)
Case alleging consumers were improperly charged undeliverable mail fees. (Settlement resulting in class members receiving 100% of their damages).
Scott+Scott Consumer Practice Group Chair Joseph P. Guglielmo has been appointed Co-Lead Counsel in In re: Consumer Vehicle Data Tracking Collection (No. 1:24-MD-3115-TWT), a multidistrict litigation pending in the United States District Court for the North District of Georgia before United States District Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr.
Read MoreScott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP recently filed a class action lawsuit against XPEL Inc. and its chief executive officers on behalf of investors who – between November 8, 2023 and May 2, 2024 – purchased securities issued by the manufacturer of protective automobile paint and window coatings.
Read MoreScott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP, along with Cafferty Clobes Meriwether & Sprengel LLP and Kirby McInerney LLP as co-counsel, last week announced a $35 million settlement reached with Apple Inc. and Apple Value Services, LLC relating to an alleged gift card scam impacting thousands of consumers nationwide. The settlement resolves the class action lawsuit Carl […]
Read MoreJudge rules in favor of allowing the 12-year-old plaintiff to remain anonymous in her pursuit of claims that the video-sharing app TikTok is illegally exploiting the personal data of children.
Read More