A securities class action has been filed against Gauzy Ltd. (GAUZ) on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Gauzy securities between March 11, 2025 through November 13, 2025. This case has been filed in the USDC – SDNY.
On November 14, 2025, before the market opened, Gauzy announced “the Commercial Court of Lyon, France, ordered the commencement of French law insolvency proceedings (“Redressement Judiciaire”) relating to three subsidiaries of Gauzy located in France.” “Redressement Judiciaire are French insolvency proceedings aimed at preserving a company’s business and operations, maintaining employment and repaying creditors while allowing for a plan to enable its recovery.” The Company further revealed the “commencement of these insolvency proceedings in France constitutes a default under the Company’s existing senior secured debt facilities, which if not remedied could lead to an event of default.” Finally, the Company disclosed that it will not be releasing its financial results for the third quarter of 2025 on November 14, 2025, as previously planned, due to the proceedings.
On this news, Gauzy’s share price fell $2.00 per share, or 49.8%, over two consecutive trading days, to close at $2.02 per share on November 17, 2025, on unusually heavy trading volume.
The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) three of the Company’s French subsidiaries lacked the financial means to meet their debts as they became due; (2) as a result, it was substantially likely insolvency proceedings would be commenced; (3) as a result, it was substantially likely a potential default under the Company’s existing senior secured debt facilities would be triggered; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.