
Bio
Carlos Cuevas is an attorney in Scott+Scott’s New York office and focuses on complex antitrust litigation and class actions.
Before joining Scott+Scott, Mr. Cuevas gained class action experience at another leading plaintiffs’ firm, where he worked on securities and antitrust class actions.
Mr. Cuevas earned his J.D. from California Western School of Law, where he received Dean’s List honors, an Academic Excellence Award, and graduated in the top third of his class. Through the New Media Rights clinic, he assisted clients with intellectual property and privacy matters on a pro bono and low-cost basis. He also served on the board of the Student Intellectual Property Law Association.
Before law school, Mr. Cuevas worked in litigation support in Portland, Oregon, assisting with matters at an employment and labor law boutique and with juvenile delinquency matters at a public defender’s office.
Mr. Cuevas is a native Spanish speaker. Outside the office, he enjoys cheering on the University of Oregon football team, spending time outdoors, and reading.
Admissions
- State of New York
Representative Cases
- In re RealPage, Inc., Rental Software Antitrust Lit (No. II), No. 3:23-md-03071 (M.D. Tenn.)
- In re: Zelis Repricing Antitrust Litigation, 1:25-cv-10734 (D. Mass.)
- In Re: Cattle and Beef Antitrust Litigation, MDL-3031-MN-0:20-cv-01319 (D. Minn.)
- Doe I et al v. Google LLC, 3:23-cv-02431(N.D. Cal.)
Education
- California Western School of Law (J.D., 2025)
- University of Oregon (B.A., International Studies – Law and Human Rights, 2020)
Practice Focus
Bio
Sample Bio Content Preview
Sample Bio Content Full.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam quis dui vitae orci dignissim egestas non sed nunc. Duis risus mi, consequat id sem sit amet, consequat commodo justo. Cras dignissim sollicitudin scelerisque. Mauris lobortis elit quis nisl viverra, a mattis est laoreet
Highlights
- Highlight 1
- Highlight 2
Admissions
- Admission 1
- Admission 2
Representative Cases
- Bio Representative Case 1
- Bio Representative Case 2