Bio

Ms. Comite is a partner in the Firm’s Connecticut office and Co-Chair of the Firm’s Consumer Practice Group.  Ms. Comite’s practice focuses exclusively on consumer class action litigation, representing plaintiff classes relating to financial, insurance, and pharmaceutical fraud, unfair business practices, false and deceptive advertising, and data privacy.  She has represented plaintiffs in class action proceedings throughout the country, predominantly in federal court, representing purchasers of consumer products, food, supplements, pharmaceuticals, healthcare services, and financial and insurance products against companies such as Aetna, Cigna, Humana, United Healthcare, Lloyd’s of London, Banco Popular, Apple Bank, L’Oreal, Clinique, Ann Taylor, Best Buy, Kohl’s, Sears, Gerber, Nestle, R.J. Reynolds, Rite Aid, Walgreens, and Walmart.

Courts have recognized Ms. Comite’s professionalism and competence.  As court-appointed co-lead counsel in First Choice Federal Credit Union v. The Wendy’s Co., No. 16-cv-00506 (W.D. Pa.), Ms. Comite represented a class of financial institutions that incurred losses arising out of a data breach and achieved a $50 million settlement—one of the largest data breach settlements reached on behalf of financial institutions.  In granting final approval to the settlement, U.S. Magistrate Judge Maureen Kelly commended Ms. Comite and her co-counsel, stating: “it’s apparent to the Court that there was substantial and significant high-level work performed by counsel for the plaintiffs” and “as involved as this case was, if every case I had was as well-organized and professionally presented as this case has been, my life would be much easier.”  Wendy’s, ECF No. 194, Nov. 6, 2019, Hrg. Tr. at 27-28, 32.

While Ms. Comite is experienced in all aspects of complex pre-trial litigation, she is particularly accomplished in achieving favorable results in discovery disputes.  In Hohider v. United Parcel Service, Inc., No.2:04-cv-00363 (W.D. Pa.), Ms. Comite spearheaded a nearly year-long investigation into every facet of UPS’s preservation methods, requiring intensive, full-time efforts by a team of attorneys and paralegals well beyond that required in the normal course of pre-trial litigation.  Ms. Comite assisted in devising the plan of investigation in weekly conference calls with the Special Master, coordinated the review of over 30,000 documents that uncovered a blatant trail of deception and prepared dozens of briefs to describe the spoliation and its ramifications on the case to the Special Master.  In reaction to UPS’s flagrant discovery abuses brought to light through the investigation, the Court conditioned the parties’ settlement of the three individual ADA cases on UPS adopting and implementing preservation practices that passed the approval of the Special Master.

Ms. Comite also was recently the sole trial counsel in a four-day jury trial in federal court of a prisoner civil rights case brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 for violation of constitutional rights under the First Amendment and was awarded Special Recognition by the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut for her dedication and service as appointed pro bono counsel, providing guidance, expertise, and quality legal services to her client in the interest of justice, and without the promise of compensation.  Ms. Comite’s appellate victories in consumer class actions include White v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Co., No. 23-220-CV, 2024 WL 194699 (2d Cir. Jan. 18, 2024) (on brief) (achieving reversal of dismissal on primary jurisdiction grounds); Nunez v. Saks Inc., 771 F. App’x 401 (9th Cir. May 30, 2019) (oral argument and on brief) (achieving reversal of dismissal); Chavez v. Nestle USA, Inc., 511 F. App’x 606 (9th Cir. 2013) (on brief) (achieving a reversal of dismissal); and In re Nutella Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig., 589 F. App’x 53 (3d Cir. 2014) (on brief) (defending settlement from professional objectors).

Prior to entering law school, Ms. Comite served in the White House as Assistant to the Special Counsel to President Clinton.  In that capacity, she handled matters related to the White House’s response to investigations, including four independent counsel investigations, a Justice Department task force investigation, two major oversight investigations by the House of Representatives and the Senate, and several other congressional oversight investigations.

In addition, Ms. Comite supports Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Special Olympics, and the American Heart Association.

Highlights

  • Lawdragon: 500 Leading Lawyers in America (2026)
  • Partner of the Year – New England Legal Awards by Law.com (2025)

Admissions

  • State of Connecticut
  • Southern District of New York
  • Northern District of New York
  • Eastern District of New York
  • District of Connecticut
  • Northern District of Illinois
  • Eastern District of Wisconsin
  • District of Colorado
  • United States Courts of Appeals for the Second Circuit
  • United States Courts of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  • United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • United States Courts of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Representative Cases

  • In re Google Assistant Privacy Litig., No. 5:19-cv-04286 (N.D. Cal.) (representing a certified class of consumers alleging California state law claims challenging Google’s disclosure of their private, confidential communications without consent)
  • Lopez v. Apple Inc., No. 4:19-cv-04577 (N.D. Cal.) (preliminary approval of a $95 million settlement on behalf of consumers and their minor children alleging privacy violations under California state law by Apple through its Siri application)
  • Forth v. Walgreen Co., No. 1:17-cv-02246 (N.D. Ill.) (preliminary approval of a $100 million settlement on behalf of consumers and third-party payors for deceptive trade practices claims against Walgreen Co.
  • In re Beech-Nut Nutrition Company Baby Food Litig., No. 21-cv-00133 (N.D.N.Y) (appointed co-lead counsel in a case related to the sale of baby foods allegedly contaminated with toxic heavy metals)
  • Snyder v. The Cigna Group, No. 3:23-cv-01451 (D. Conn.) (co-lead counsel in a case alleging insureds were wrongly denied an adequate review of their medical claims and thus were overcharged for medical care)
  • Kulwicki v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., No. 22-cv-0229 (D. Conn.) (co-lead counsel in a case alleging insureds were discriminated against under the Affordable Care Act)
  • Anaya v. Cencora, Inc., No. 2:24-cv-02961 (E.D. Pa.) (co-lead counsel; preliminary approval of $40 million settlement)
  • In re Fortra File Transfer Software Data Security Breach Litig., MDL No. 24-03090 (S.D. Fla.) (one of the track leads; $20 million settlement on behalf of a class of consumers)
  • In re Change Healthcare, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litig., MDL No. 24-3108 (D. Minn.) (PSC member for the patient track)
  • In re AT&T, Inc. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., MDL No. 24-3114 (N.D. Tex.) (PSC Briefing Committee)
  • In re Equifax, Inc. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., MDL No. 2800 (N.D. Ga.) (chair of law and briefing committee) (settlement valued in excess of $32.5 million on behalf of financial institutions involving data breach of credit and debit card information)
  • In re The Home Depot, Inc., Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., MDL No. 2583 (N.D. Ga.) (briefing and discovery committees; $27.25 million settlement)
  • In re Target Corp. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., MDL No. 2522 (D. Minn.) (deposed apex witness; $59 million settlement)
  • Veridian Credit Union v. Eddie Bauer LLC, No. 2:17-cv-00356 (W.D. Wash.) (briefing, discovery, and settlement committees; settlement valued at $9.8 million)
  • Greater Chautauqua Federal Credit Union v. Kmart Corp., No. 15-cv-02228 (N.D. Ill.) (chair of the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee; $8.1 million settlement)
  • Arkansas Federal Credit Union v. Hudson’s Bay Co., No. 19-cv-4492 (S.D.N.Y.) (co-lead counsel; $5.1 settlement).
  • Aquilina v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, No. 1:18-cv-00496 (D. Haw.) (class action settlement providing for 100% of damages on behalf of class of Hawaii homeowners who were placed into insurance excluding lava coverage and suffered devastating losses as a result of the 2018 eruption of Kilauea)
  • In re Robinhood Outage Litig., No. 3:20-cv-01626 (N.D. Cal.) ($9.9 settlement)
  • Morrow v. Ann, Inc., No. 1:16-cv-03340 (S.D.N.Y.) ($8.1 million settlement)
  • Murr v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., No. 13-cv-1 091 (E.D. Va.) ($7.3 million settlement)
  • Luca v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp., No. 2:16-cv-00746 (W.D. Pa.) ($7.6 settlement)
  • Howerton v. Cargill, Inc., No. 13-cv-00336 (D. Haw.) ($6.1 settlement)
  • Valle v. Popular Community Bank, No. 653936/2012 (N.Y. Supreme Ct.) ($5.2 million settlement)
  • In re Nutella Mktg. & Sales Practices Litigation, No. 11-cv-01086 (D.N.J.) ($2.5 million settlement)

Education

  • University of Washington School of Law (J.D., 2002)
  • Dartmouth College (B.A., magna cum laude, 1994)