THE ONE-STOP SHOP
FOR GLOBAL RECOUPMENT

Scott+Scott specializes in the investigation and prosecution of complex actions across the globe – recovering billions for our clients. The Firm has extensive experience litigating securities fraud, antitrust, and other complex cases and is a pioneer in structured finance monitoring for client portfolios. Scott+Scott’s proprietary PT+ monitoring service has been providing our institutional investor clients with comprehensive monitoring, superior tracking, and unparalleled securities analysis at no cost for more than 20 years.

About Us

Get To know us

Practice Areas

Scott+Scott has extensive experience litigating across the following practice areas internationally:

Report a Fraud View Cases

Landmark Cases

US FOREX

Antitrust + Competition

$2.3 Billion in US settlements for market manipulation

BoA/US BANCORP

Securities Litigation

Novel investment recovery under The Trust Indenture Act

Wendy's

Consumer Litigation

Data Breach case with $50 Million settlement

GOOGLE

Corporate Governance

Record-setting sexual harassment settlement of $310 Million in corporate reforms

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
WITH IN-HOUSE SERVICES

Scott+Scott has been offering our proprietary global monitoring service to clients, free of charge, for over 20 years. Our internal investigations team informs our client with recommendations and helps discover critical evidence and intelligence that support our litigation efforts.

PT+ Monitoring Investigations

News + Press

Securities Litigation Co-Lead Counsel Appointment in Case Against Transmedics Group

Co-Lead Counsel Appointment in Case Against Transmedics Group


Scott+Scott this week was appointed Co-Lead Counsel in a securities class action against the organ transplant technology provider Transmedics Group, Inc., and the company’s senior executives. According to the court order by Judge Leo T. Sorokin of the United States District Court of the District of Massachusetts, the plaintiffs allege that TransMedics “made statements […] about its business practices and revenue generation that were materially false and misleading.” The plaintiffs’ class period is between February 28, 2023, and January 10, 2025, inclusive.

Read More
Securities Litigation
Consumer Scott+Scott Files Class Action Against Blue Shield

Scott+Scott Files Class Action Against Blue Shield


Scott+Scott, along with three other law firms as co-counsel, this week filed a data privacy class action lawsuit against Blue Shield of California on behalf of current and former members whose communications, medical information, financial details, and other personal information were improperly disclosed. The complaint alleges that Blue Shield shared the health information of current and former members with unauthorized third parties through invisible online surveillance and tracking technologies embedded on its website.

Read More
Consumer
DERIVATIVE Co-Lead Counsel Appointment in Boeing Derivative Suit

Co-Lead Counsel Appointment in Boeing Derivative Suit


We are pleased to announce that Vice Chancellor Morgan T. Zurn has appointed Scott+Scott as Co-Lead Counsel in a lawsuit filed against certain directors and officers of The Boeing Co. regarding their continued lack of oversight over airplane safety. The lawsuit, filed by Scott+Scott, along with co-counsel, challenges significant oversight failures that have led to, or otherwise allowed, serious production and safety issues at Boeing to remain unchecked.  The plaintiffs in the Delaware lawsuit include three pension fund stockholders: Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System, Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, and State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio. 

Read More
DERIVATIVE
Securities Litigation Securities Case Against Hayward Moves Forward

Securities Case Against Hayward Moves Forward


A Scott+Scott Securities Practice Group case filed against pool manufacturer Hayward Holdings, Inc. and its top executives has successfully overcome a significant hurdle to move forward. Judge William J. Martini, United States District Court Judge for the District of New Jersey, this week granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motions to dismiss the case. As the consolidated amended class action complaint alleges, the defendants made false and misleading statements about the company’s channel inventory, demand, and sales.

Read More
Securities Litigation